Critical discourse analysis of Obama’s and Trump’s speeches using Halliday And Hassan’s lexical cohesive theory
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.64908/6mp34674Keywords:
Critical Discourse Analysis; Lexical Cohesion; Obama; Political Speeches, Trump.Abstract
In everyday life, humans create text while speaking or writing, which is considered a tool of communication. Speech is the verbal form of communication that helps people interact with each other, convey information, and influence and encourage people to take certain actions. Cohesion is a key element in both spoken and written text construction that helps the reader or listener grasp the information by making it productive and logical. This study tries to identify different kinds of lexical cohesion devices used in the speeches of Trump and Obama. Obama's and Donald’s speeches text aided as the main source of data for this qualitative descriptive study, which focused on the lexical cohesion theory presented by Halliday and Hasan 1976. After data analysis, the researcher found various lexical cohesive devices in the speeches such as repetition, synonym, superordinate, general word, and collocation. In both speeches, repetition is one of the most used lexical devices and general words are the least used. In Obama’s speech repetition contains 75% and general words 2% while in Donald’s 34% and 4% respectively. Repetition helps the speakers to make the argument stronger. These strategies were employed to help the audience to comprehend perfectly what was said.
Downloads
References
Abd Allah, M. J. M. (2019). Investigating Cohesive Devices in Wordsworth Poetry. Arab World English Journal3 (1), 157–177. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24093/awejtls/vol3no1.13
Al-Majali, W. (2015). Discourse analysis of the political speeches of the ousted Arab Presidents during the Arab Spring Revolution using Halliday and Hasan’s framework of cohesion. Journal of Education and Practice, 6(14), 96–108.
Baker, M. (2018). In other words: A coursebook on translation. Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315619187
Bell, J. M., & Hartmann, D. (2007). Diversity in everyday discourse: The cultural ambiguities and consequences of “happy talk.” American Sociological Review, 72(6), 895–914. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/000312240707200603
Bloor, M., & Bloor, T. (2013). The practice of critical discourse analysis: An introduction. Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203775660
Brown, G., Brown, G. D., Yule, G., Brown, G. R., & Gillian, B. (1983). Discourse analysis. Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511805226
Callow, K. (1974). Discourse considerations in translating the Word of God.
Connor, U. (1984). A study of cohesion and coherence in English as a second language students’ writing. Research on Language & Social Interaction, 17(3), 301–316. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08351818409389208
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2016). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Sage publications.
Gee, J. P. (2004). Discourse analysis: What makes it critical? In An introduction to critical discourse analysis in education (pp. 49–80). Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410609786-9
Halliday, M. A. K. (1978). Language as social semiotic: The social interpretation of language and meaning (Vol. 42). Edward Arnold London.
Halliday, M. A. K., & Hasan, R. (1989). Language, context, and text: Aspects of language in a social-semiotic perspective.
Halliday, M. A. K., & Hasan, R. (2014). Cohesion in english (Issue 9). Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315836010
Handford, M., & Gee, J. P. (2013). The Routledge handbook of discourse analysis. Routledge.
Lidinillah, M. K. (2021). A STUDY OF LEXICAL COHESION IN THE LYRIC OF DEMI LOVATO’S SONG IN’TELL ME YOU LOVE ME’ALBUM. SPHOTA: Jurnal Linguistik Dan Sastra, 13(1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.36733/sphota.v13i1.1466
Lyons, J., & John, L. (1995). Linguistic semantics: An introduction. Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511810213
Malah, Z., Tan, H., & Rashid, S. M. (2017). Evaluating lexical cohesion in Nigerian newspaper genres: Focus on the editorials. International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature, 6(1), 240–256. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.6n.1p.240
Muhyidin, A. (2019). Lexical Cohesion Study in Collection of Hujan Bulan Juni Potery and Its Relevance as a Literature Learning Material in Junior High School. Opción: Revista de Ciencias Humanas y Sociales, 22, 1350–1363.
Nuttall, C. (1996). Teaching reading skills in a foreign language. ERIC.
Schmitt, N. (2013). An introduction to applied linguistics. Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203783733
Taboada, M. (2004). Building coherence and cohesion. Building Coherence and Cohesion, 1–282. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.129
Wodak, R. (2004). Critical discourse analysis. Qualitative Research Practice, 185, 185–204. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781848608191.d17
Wodak, R. (2005). Gender mainstreaming and the European Union: Interdisciplinarity, gender studies and CDA. Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230599901_4
Tahseen, H. (2008). Cohesion in Texts: A Discourse Analysis of a News Article in a Magazine. Al-Fatih Journal, 4(37).
Notes
Links for both speeches
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2012/nov/07/barack-obama-speech-full-text
https://www.politico.com/story/2017/09/19/trump-un-speech-2017-full-text-transcript-242879
